Ramswaroop And Anr. vs State Of M.P. on 3 August, 2005
There is no bar that the conviction cannot be recorded on the evidence of solitary eye-witness. It is true that in such circumstances the evidence of solitary eye-witness should be scrutinised carefully and that should be not only corroborated, but must be cogent, reliable and should inspire confidence
Virender Kumar @ Gara vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 18 December, 2000
The testimony of a solitary eye witness, particularly when his testimony is found to be reliable and trust worthy, the accused can be convicted. It is only when the testimony of solitary eye witness is partly reliable that it requires corroboration
2- Munna @ Pooran Yadav vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 4 November, 2008
There is no bar that the conviction cannot be recorded on the evidence of solitary eye-witness. It is true that in such circumstances the evidence of solitary eye-witness should be scrutinised carefully and that should be not only corroborated, but must be cogent, reliable and should inspire confidence
Virender Kumar @ Gara vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 18 December, 2000
The testimony of a solitary eye witness, particularly when his testimony is found to be reliable and trust worthy, the accused can be convicted. It is only when the testimony of solitary eye witness is partly reliable that it requires corroboration
See-
1- Namdeo vs State Of Maharashtra on 13 March, 20072- Munna @ Pooran Yadav vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 4 November, 2008
No comments:
Post a Comment